top of page

Shen Wang, J.D./M.B.A. | Partner

Shen Wang Website_edited.png

Email: shenwang@archlakelaw.com

Phone: 636-236-5390

Fax: 312-614-1873

Education and Honors

Beijing Normal University (B.S.)

Computer Information Technology

Beijing Normal University’s Knowledge Contest (First Place)

Old Dominion University (M.S.)

Computer Science

Washington University Olin Business School (M.B.A.)

Olin Business School Negotiation Contest (First Place)

Washington University in St. Louis School of Law (J.D.)

China Law Society (President)

Intellectual Property & Technology Law Award (Recipient)

Missouri State Circuit Court (Intern)

Bar and Court Admissions

Illinois

NDIL, EDTX

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

United States Court of Appeals for

the Federal Circuit and the Second Circuit

Professional Membership

USITC trial lawyer association

Chicago Asian Bar Association

NAPABA

Languages

English

Mandarin

Shen Wang is an Intellectual Property attorney with extensive experience in patent prosecution, patent litigation, client counseling, and technology development and analysis.  Shen was a patent Examiner before becoming a patent attorney.  Shen has prosecuted and reviewed more than 500 patent applications in the technology areas of computer software, network, printer control, semiconductor, error-correcting coding, LCD and telecommunication.  Shen has experience litigating patents in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) and U.S. district courts.  Shen’s extensive experience includes client counseling, freedom to operation (FTO) analysis and licensing negotiations.

Shen was a law clerk for Judge Ohmer in the 22nd Juidical Circuit of State of Missouri and taught international patent practice as an adjunct professor at Washington University in St. Louis School of Law.  Shen was a senior technical architect with a major telecommunication company before practicing laws.

Work Experience

  • Arch & Lake LLP, Chicago, IL, Partner  (Mar. 2018 - Present)

  • Quarles & Brady, Chicago, IL, Attorney (2016 –2017)

  • Brinks Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, Patent Attorney (2013-2016)

  • The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, Patent Examiner (2012-2013)

  • AT&T Inc., St. Louis, MO, Senior Technical Architect (1998-2011)

Representative Cases

  • VARTA Microbattery GmbH v. EVE Energy Co., Ltd., EDTX-2-21-cv-00399

  • Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd., EDTX-2-21-cv-00240

  • Vista Peak Ventures, LLC v. HKC Corporation Limited et al., EDTX-2-20-cv-00352

  • Limoss US, LLC v. Remacro Machinery & Technology Co., Ltd. et al, NCMD-1-18-cv-00948

  • Unicorn Global, Inc. et al v. E-Link Technology Co. Ltd. et al., NDIL-1-20-cv-04127

  • Hanshow America Inc. et al v. SES-imagotag GmbH, EDVA-1-22-cv-01345

  • Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd. v. SES-imagotag SA et al., EDTX-2-23-cv-00174

  • Ultra-Mek, Inc. v. United Furniture Industries, Inc. et al., NCMD-1-18-cv-00281.

  • Raffel Systems, LLC, v. Man Wah Holdings Ltd., WIED-2-18-CV-01765.

  • Man Wah Holdings Limited v. Raffel Systems, LLC, PTAB IPR2019-00616, regarding Patent 8,714,505

  • Man Wah Holdings Limited v. Raffel Systems, LLC, Ltd. et al, PTAB IPR2019-00530, regarding Patent D643252

  • Man Wah Holdings Limited v. Raffel Systems, LLC, PTAB PGR2019-00029, regarding Patent D821986

  • L&P Property Management Company et al v. Remacro Machinery & Technology (Wujiang) Co., Ltd. et al, PTAB IPR2019-00255, regarding Patent 9,756,949.

  • Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. v. iRobot Corporation, PTAB IPR2018-00898, regarding Patent 8,600,553.

  • Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. v. iRobot Corporation, PTAB IPR2018-00897, regarding Patent 6,809,490.

  • Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. v. iRobot Corporation, PTAB IPR2018-00882, regarding Patent 9,038,233.

  • Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. v. iRobot Corporation, PTAB IPR2018-00880, regarding Patent 8,474,090.

  • Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. iRobot Corporation, PTAB IPR2018-00761, regarding Patent 7,155,308.

  • Wisely Products LLC v. Telebrands Corporation, PTAB-PGR2018-00003, regarding Patent 9,546,775.

Publication

  • “Fed. Circ. Breaks Impasse On ITC Authority In Suprema” – Law360, New York, August 10, 2015.

  • “As NPEs Experience Some Turbulence In District Court, Are The Skies Friendlier At The ITC?” – The Paul Luckern Summer Associate Edition – Section 337 Reporter 2012.

  • “Electronic Data Interchange” – Feb. 1993, Computer World of China.

Presentation and Speech

  • “Domestic Industry requirements in USITC Section 337 litigations” – TSMC IP seminar, July 2014.

  • “Impact of USPTO’s Examiner accounting system to the patent prosecution”  -- Beijing IP conference, September 2015

  • “U.S. Design patent application”  -- DJI IP seminar, June 2017

  • “New developments of 101 and 112 issues encountered in the U.S. patent prosecution” – Shenzhen Industry IP conference, April 2018

bottom of page